Rename the extracted boost subdirectory to ndnboost
diff --git a/ndnboost/config/compiler/intel.hpp b/ndnboost/config/compiler/intel.hpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e79e3cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ndnboost/config/compiler/intel.hpp
@@ -0,0 +1,272 @@
+// (C) Copyright John Maddock 2001-8.
+// (C) Copyright Peter Dimov 2001.
+// (C) Copyright Jens Maurer 2001.
+// (C) Copyright David Abrahams 2002 - 2003.
+// (C) Copyright Aleksey Gurtovoy 2002 - 2003.
+// (C) Copyright Guillaume Melquiond 2002 - 2003.
+// (C) Copyright Beman Dawes 2003.
+// (C) Copyright Martin Wille 2003.
+// Use, modification and distribution are subject to the
+// Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file
+// LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
+
+// See http://www.boost.org for most recent version.
+
+// Intel compiler setup:
+
+#include "ndnboost/config/compiler/common_edg.hpp"
+
+#if defined(__INTEL_COMPILER)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __INTEL_COMPILER
+#elif defined(__ICL)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __ICL
+#elif defined(__ICC)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __ICC
+#elif defined(__ECC)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION __ECC
+#endif
+
+// Flags determined by comparing output of 'icpc -dM -E' with and without '-std=c++0x'
+#if (!(defined(_WIN32) || defined(_WIN64)) && defined(__STDC_HOSTED__) && (__STDC_HOSTED__ && (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 1200))) || defined(__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CPP0X__)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X
+#endif
+#if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1600)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X
+#endif
+
+#ifdef BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X
+#define BOOST_COMPILER "Intel C++ C++0x mode version " BOOST_STRINGIZE(BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION)
+#else
+#define BOOST_COMPILER "Intel C++ version " BOOST_STRINGIZE(BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION)
+#endif
+#define BOOST_INTEL BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION
+
+#if defined(_WIN32) || defined(_WIN64)
+# define BOOST_INTEL_WIN BOOST_INTEL
+#else
+# define BOOST_INTEL_LINUX BOOST_INTEL
+#endif
+
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 500) && defined(_MSC_VER)
+# define BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS
+# define BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATES
+#endif
+
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 600)
+
+# if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER <= 1300) // added check for <= VC 7 (Peter Dimov)
+
+// Boost libraries assume strong standard conformance unless otherwise
+// indicated by a config macro. As configured by Intel, the EDG front-end
+// requires certain compiler options be set to achieve that strong conformance.
+// Particularly /Qoption,c,--arg_dep_lookup (reported by Kirk Klobe & Thomas Witt)
+// and /Zc:wchar_t,forScope. See boost-root/tools/build/intel-win32-tools.jam for
+// details as they apply to particular versions of the compiler. When the
+// compiler does not predefine a macro indicating if an option has been set,
+// this config file simply assumes the option has been set.
+// Thus BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP will not be defined, even if
+// the compiler option is not enabled.
+
+# define BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF
+# endif
+
+// Void returns, 64 bit integrals don't work when emulating VC 6 (Peter Dimov)
+
+# if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER <= 1200)
+# define BOOST_NO_VOID_RETURNS
+# define BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T
+# endif
+
+#endif
+
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 710) && defined(_WIN32)
+# define BOOST_NO_POINTER_TO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
+#endif
+
+// See http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/1614864
+#if BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION < 600
+# define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
+#else
+// We should test the macro _WCHAR_T_DEFINED to check if the compiler
+// supports wchar_t natively. *BUT* there is a problem here: the standard
+// headers define this macro if they typedef wchar_t. Anyway, we're lucky
+// because they define it without a value, while Intel C++ defines it
+// to 1. So we can check its value to see if the macro was defined natively
+// or not.
+// Under UNIX, the situation is exactly the same, but the macro _WCHAR_T
+// is used instead.
+# if ((_WCHAR_T_DEFINED + 0) == 0) && ((_WCHAR_T + 0) == 0)
+# define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
+# endif
+#endif
+
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(BOOST_FUNCTION_SCOPE_USING_DECLARATION_BREAKS_ADL)
+//
+// Figure out when Intel is emulating this gcc bug
+// (All Intel versions prior to 9.0.26, and versions
+// later than that if they are set up to emulate gcc 3.2
+// or earlier):
+//
+# if ((__GNUC__ == 3) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ <= 2)) || (BOOST_INTEL < 900) || (__INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE < 20050912)
+# define BOOST_FUNCTION_SCOPE_USING_DECLARATION_BREAKS_ADL
+# endif
+#endif
+#if (defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ < 4)) || defined(_WIN32) || (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION <= 1200)
+// GCC or VC emulation:
+#define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP
+#endif
+//
+// Verify that we have actually got BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
+// set correctly, if we don't do this now, we will get errors later
+// in type_traits code among other things, getting this correct
+// for the Intel compiler is actually remarkably fragile and tricky:
+//
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+#if defined(BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T)
+#include <cwchar>
+template< typename T > struct assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t;
+template<> struct assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t<wchar_t> { typedef void type; };
+// if you see an error here then you need to unset BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T
+// where it is defined above:
+typedef assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t<unsigned short>::type assert_no_intrinsic_wchar_t_;
+#else
+template< typename T > struct assert_intrinsic_wchar_t;
+template<> struct assert_intrinsic_wchar_t<wchar_t> {};
+// if you see an error here then define BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T on the command line:
+template<> struct assert_intrinsic_wchar_t<unsigned short> {};
+#endif
+#endif
+
+#if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER+0 >= 1000)
+# if _MSC_VER >= 1200
+# define BOOST_HAS_MS_INT64
+# endif
+# define BOOST_NO_SWPRINTF
+# define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP
+#elif defined(_WIN32)
+# define BOOST_DISABLE_WIN32
+#endif
+
+// I checked version 6.0 build 020312Z, it implements the NRVO.
+// Correct this as you find out which version of the compiler
+// implemented the NRVO first. (Daniel Frey)
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION >= 600)
+# define BOOST_HAS_NRVO
+#endif
+
+//
+// versions check:
+// we don't support Intel prior to version 5.0:
+#if BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION < 500
+# error "Compiler not supported or configured - please reconfigure"
+#endif
+
+// Intel on MacOS requires
+#if defined(__APPLE__) && defined(__INTEL_COMPILER)
+# define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP
+#endif
+
+// Intel on Altix Itanium
+#if defined(__itanium__) && defined(__INTEL_COMPILER)
+# define BOOST_NO_TWO_PHASE_NAME_LOOKUP
+#endif
+
+//
+// An attempt to value-initialize a pointer-to-member may trigger an
+// internal error on Intel <= 11.1 (last checked version), as was
+// reported by John Maddock, Intel support issue 589832, May 2010.
+// Moreover, according to test results from Huang-Vista-x86_32_intel,
+// intel-vc9-win-11.1 may leave a non-POD array uninitialized, in some
+// cases when it should be value-initialized.
+// (Niels Dekker, LKEB, May 2010)
+// Apparently Intel 12.1 (compiler version number 9999 !!) has the same issue (compiler regression).
+#if defined(__INTEL_COMPILER)
+# if (__INTEL_COMPILER <= 1110) || (__INTEL_COMPILER == 9999)
+# define BOOST_NO_COMPLETE_VALUE_INITIALIZATION
+# endif
+#endif
+
+//
+// Dynamic shared object (DSO) and dynamic-link library (DLL) support
+//
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 4)
+# define BOOST_SYMBOL_EXPORT __attribute__((visibility("default")))
+# define BOOST_SYMBOL_IMPORT
+# define BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE __attribute__((visibility("default")))
+#endif
+//
+// C++0x features
+// - ICC added static_assert in 11.0 (first version with C++0x support)
+//
+#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X)
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_STATIC_ASSERT
+//
+// These pass our test cases, but aren't officially supported according to:
+// http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/c0x-features-supported-by-intel-c-compiler/
+//
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_LAMBDAS
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_LOCAL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_DECLARATIONS
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_MULTIDECLARATIONS
+#endif
+
+#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X) && (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION >= 1200)
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES // Enabling this breaks Filesystem and Exception libraries
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS // doesn't really work!!
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_LAMBDAS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_LOCAL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_DECLARATIONS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_MULTIDECLARATIONS
+#endif
+
+// icl Version 12.1.0.233 Build 20110811 and possibly some other builds
+// had an incorrect __INTEL_COMPILER value of 9999. Intel say this has been fixed.
+#if defined(BOOST_INTEL_STDCXX0X) && (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION > 1200)
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_DEFAULT_ARGS
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES
+# undef BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
+# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES
+
+// http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/c0x-features-supported-by-intel-c-compiler/
+// continues to list scoped enum support as "Partial"
+//# undef BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
+#endif
+
+#if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER <= 1700)
+//
+// Although the Intel compiler is capable of supporting these, it appears not to in MSVC compatibility mode:
+//
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
+# define BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
+#endif
+
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION < 1200)
+//
+// fenv.h appears not to work with Intel prior to 12.0:
+//
+# define BOOST_NO_FENV_H
+#endif
+
+//
+// last known and checked version:
+#if (BOOST_INTEL_CXX_VERSION > 1200)
+# if defined(BOOST_ASSERT_CONFIG)
+# error "Unknown compiler version - please run the configure tests and report the results"
+# elif defined(_MSC_VER)
+//
+// We don't emit this warning any more, since we have so few
+// defect macros set anyway (just the one).
+//
+//# pragma message("Unknown compiler version - please run the configure tests and report the results")
+# endif
+#endif
+